<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gladiator Research and Security &#187; Buffer Overflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/tag/buffer-overflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://research.gladtech.net</link>
	<description>Targeted security alerts and advice for financial insititutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does Vista Have a New Vulnerability?</title>
		<link>http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/2008/11/26/does-vista-have-a-new-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/2008/11/26/does-vista-have-a-new-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Spanier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffer Overflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CreateIpForwardEntry2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCP/IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.gladtech.net/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been reports of a new vulnerability in Microsoft Vista that would allow a local user to run code as System, which is an even higher privilege level than Administrator.  However, the user would have to be an Administrator to exploit the vulnerability, and the practical differences between Administrator and System are minimal.  So [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/2008/11/26/does-vista-have-a-new-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backup Exec Multiple Vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/2008/11/20/backup-exec-multiple-vulnerabilities/</link>
		<comments>http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/2008/11/20/backup-exec-multiple-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Spanier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authentication Bypass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup Exec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup Exec Remote Agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffer Overflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.gladtech.net/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GSA Reference Number: AD081120-01 Simply Put: Symantec Backup Exec versions 11.x and 12.x are vulnerable to a denial of service attack and an authentication bypass attack.  These vulnerabilities, if exploited together, can lead to a remote code exploit.  Both issues affect the Backup Exec Remote Agent. Attack Details: The Remote Agent is vulnerable to authentication [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://research.gladtech.net/index.php/2008/11/20/backup-exec-multiple-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

